Indigeneity & Capitalism

Indigeneity and the constitution of capitalist relations This theme is explored most intensively in Land’s End, where I examine why indigenous upland farmers moved from common access to customary land to exclusive, individual ownership and the emergence of landlessness in a period of just 16 years (1990-2006). The process was very intimate, as close kin and neighbours excluded each other from access to land by planting tree crops, and soon thereafter began to treat land as a commodity that could be bought, sold and accumulated.  I was able to track how highlanders managed this transformation culturally, the idioms the new landowners used to justify their own advance, and the response of newly landless highlanders to their often desperate situation. De facto proletarians under conditions where there was little demand for their labour either on or off farm, their prospects were bleak.

Contra expectations that could be generated by readings of Polanyi, or by studies of “shared poverty” (Geertz) or “moral economies” (Scott), or by some of the advocacy literature promoting indigenous alternatives or the “peasant way,” I found that the landless did not dispute the legitimacy of the market processes through which they had become dispossessed, nor did they call for a return to previous, more inclusive principles of land access based on criteria of descent, residence and need. They still hoped to benefit from the boom crop that had brought new wealth to the hills.  These observations led me to the conclusion that concepts of village, community, or household that assume solidarity are unhelpful points of entry for understanding contemporary agrarian relations, as they carry too much ideological freight. Shorn of assumptions about the  “Asian village” – or family – or indigenous community – I could reopen a series of fundamental ethnographic questions: what specific sets of social relations enable or disallow a decent life for my interlocutors, and how are those relations formed, sustained, and altered?  More specifically, a) under what conditions do indigenous smallholders abandon food production, crop diversity and other strategies previously used to minimize risk, in order to concentrate on commodities that promise high returns? b) when do households, kingroups and communities mobilize to provide protection for their members, and when do relations of mutual security or patronage attenuate, leaving individuals exposed? c) what is the fate of people who exit from the rural economy with very limited social networks, and minimal assets?

Book

Land’s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier

Li_LandsEnd-reducedWinner of the American Ethnological Society Senior Book Prize, 2016

Winner of the George T McKahin Prize, Association for Asian Studies, 2016

Drawing on two decades of ethnographic research in Sulawesi, Indonesia, Tania Murray Li offers an intimate account of the emergence of capitalist relations among indigenous highlanders who privatized their common land to plant a boom crop, cacao. Spurred by the hope of ending their poverty and isolation, some prospered, while others lost their land and struggled to sustain their families. Yet the winners and losers in this transition were not strangers—they were kin and neighbors. Li’s richly peopled account takes the reader into the highlanders’ world, exploring the dilemmas they faced as sharp inequalities emerged among them.

The book challenges complacent, modernization narratives promoted by development agencies that assume inefficient farmers who lose out in the shift to high-value export crops can find jobs elsewhere. Decades of uneven and often jobless growth in Indonesia meant that for newly landless highlanders, land’s end was a dead end. The book also has implications for social movement activists, who seldom attend to instances where enclosure is initiated by farmers rather than coerced by the state or agribusiness corporations. Li’s attention to the historical, cultural, and ecological dimensions of this conjuncture demonstrates the power of the ethnographic method and its relevance to theory and practice today.

Click here for more on Land’s End.

Articles

Li, T. (2014). Can there be Food Sovereignty Here?, Journal of Peasant Studies, 42 (1): 205-11

Li, T. (2014). Fixing Non-market Subjects: Governing Land and Population in the Global South, Foucault Studies, 18: 34-48.

Li, T. (2014). Involution’s Dynamic Others. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, NS: 20:276-292.

Li, T. (2010).  Indigeneity, Capitalism, and the Management of Dispossession.  Current Anthropology 51(3): 385-414.

Li, T. (2002). Ethnic Cleansing, Recursive Knowledge, and the Dilemmas of Sedentarism. International Journal of Social Science 173: 361-371.

Li, T. (2002). Local Histories, Global Markets: Cocoa and Class in Upland Sulawesi.  Development and Change  33(3): 415-437.

Li, T. (2002). Engaging Simplifications: Community Based Resource Management, Market Processes and State Agendas in Upland Southeast Asia.  World Development 30(2):265-283.

Li, T. (2001). Agrarian Differentiation and the Limits of Natural Resource Management in Upland Southeast Asia. IDS Bulletin 32(4): 88-94.

Li, T. (2001). Masyarakat Adat, Difference, and the Limits of Recognition in Indonesia’s Forest Zone.  Modern  Asian Studies 35(3): 645-676.

Li, T. (2001). Relational Histories and the Production of Difference on Sulawesi’s Upland Frontier.  Journal of Asian Studies 60(1): 41-66.

Li, T. (2000). Articulating Indigenous Identity in Indonesia: Resource Politics and the Tribal Slot. Comparative Studies in Society and History 42(1): 149-179.

Li, T. (1998).Working Separately but Eating Together: Personhood, Property and Power in Conjugal Relations. American Ethnologist 25(4): 675-694.

Li, T. (1996). Images of Community: Discourse and Strategy in Property Relations.  Development and Change 27(3): 501-527.

Book Chapters

Li, T. (2008).  Reflections on Indonesian violence: two tales and three silences. In Leo Panitch and Colin Leys (Eds.) 2009 Socialist Register VIOLENCE TODAY: Actually existing barbarism Pontypool: Merlin Press, pp163-180.

Interviews

Hairong, Y. (2017). Bottom-up capitalism as a challenge for social movements: a conversation with Tania Murray Li. Critical Asian Studies49(2), 257-267.

Videos

Interview on Land’s End book and Food Sovereignty by Boa Monjane

Interview by Oxfam on New trends in Land Inequality: Oxfam speaks with Tania Li

UTSC Albert Berry Lecture Series:Capitalism from Above and Below

Ohio State University. 2015 Taaffe Colloquium

Land’ s End Visual Tour

University of Toronto Anthropology. Moving Encounters: Interview with Tania Li about Land’s End by Lukas Ley

Moving Encounters: Part 2 of Interview with Tania Li about Land’s End

International Institute of Social Studies (ISS). Food Sovereignty: A critical dialogue

 

Advertisements